Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1997-05-11 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1997-05-11 House Journal Page 1880 SB 107 Amendment No. 20 was offered by Representative Austerman: Page 29, line 10: Delete "100,000,000" Insert "250,000,000" 1997-05-11 House Journal Page 1881 SB 107 Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 20 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Davies, Davis, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kemplen, Kott, Kubina, Moses, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Croft, Dyson, Hanley, Hodgins, Joule, Kelly, Kohring, Kookesh, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Grussendorf changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Bunde changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Mulder changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 20 was not adopted. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1997-05-11 House Journal Page 1882 SB 107 HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 34 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Croft, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kemplen, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Moses, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Williams Nays: Davies, Joule, Kookesh, Nicholia, Vezey Absent: Mulder And so, HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H passed the House. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Kubina gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H. SB 107 Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the reconsideration of HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H was again before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1997-05-11 House Journal Page 1883 SB 107 HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 34 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Croft, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kemplen, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Moses, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Williams Nays: Davies, Joule, Kookesh, Nicholia, Vezey Absent: Mulder And so, HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. In accordance with Rule 43(b) of the Uniform Rules, the Speaker waived engrossment of HCS CSSB 107(FIN) am H and it was referred to the Chief Clerk for transmittal to the Senate with copies of certified amendments attached.